Collins to Back Jackson for Supreme Court, Giving Her a G.O.P. Vote – The New York Times

Supported by
Senator Susan Collins, a centrist from Maine, said a second meeting with Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson alleviated her concerns. It is unclear if other Republicans will join her.
Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

WASHINGTON — Senator Susan Collins of Maine plans to vote to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, ensuring that President Biden’s nominee and the first Black woman to be put forward for the post will receive at least one Republican backer.
But whether Ms. Collins’s support is singular or opens the door to Judge Jackson attracting the votes of other Republicans remained to be seen. The universe of potential backers from across the aisle shrunk on Wednesday with an announcement by Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, that he would oppose the nominee. Mr. Tillis, a member of the Judiciary Committee, had once been seen as a potential vote for confirmation.
Even as he praised Judge Jackson’s “knowledge, her composure and her character,” Mr. Tillis said he could not vote to put her on the court. “I still hold my initial concerns that she may legislate from the bench instead of consistently following the Constitution as written,” he said in a statement that also noted her refusal to condemn adding seats to the court — an issue multiple Republicans have cited as problematic.
The White House would dearly like to see more than one Republican back Judge Jackson. They had hoped that the historic nature of her nomination would attract support from lawmakers who might view her as more liberal than they would prefer, but still wanted to be counted among those supporting elevating a Black woman to the court. But after a bruising set of hearings where Republicans attacked Judge Jackson’s record and sought to portray her as a liberal extremist, most members of the party seem inclined to oppose her.
Despite a backlash from some quarters to the hostile and combative questioning of Judge Jackson by multiple G.O.P. members of the Judiciary Committee last week, Republicans privately said they thought the hearing did not inflict political damage on them. Instead, they argue that it helped them get across their midterm election message that Democrats are soft on crime and pushing an ultraliberal agenda, including transgender rights and a variety of efforts to address race, that alienates many Americans.
Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the minority leader, underscored that theme on Wednesday with another floor speech sharply critical of Judge Jackson and her sentencing record, in which he said leniency was a “consistent thread” that ran through her career. Independent analyses have found that her sentencing history has fallen in the mainstream.
Ms. Collins made her decision to back the nomination after a second personal meeting with the judge on Tuesday afternoon. Ms. Collins said Judge Jackson had alleviated some concerns that surfaced after last week’s hearings.
The centrist senator, often a key vote on Supreme Court clashes, said that she had been reassured that Judge Jackson would not be “bending the law to meet a personal preference” and that the nominee met her personal standard for serving on the court.
“In recent years, senators on both sides of the aisle have gotten away from what I perceive to be the appropriate process for evaluating judicial nominees,” she said. “In my view, the role under the Constitution assigned to the Senate is to look at the credentials, experience and qualifications of the nominee. It is not to assess whether a nominee reflects the individual ideology of a senator or would vote exactly as an individual senator would want.”
If Democrats stay united, Ms. Collins’s vote would avoid the spectacle of Vice President Kamala Harris having to break a tie to seat a nominee on the Supreme Court, an unprecedented outcome that some saw as potentially damaging to the court’s standing.
Among other Republicans on the White House wish list are two retiring senators, Richard M. Burr of North Carolina and Roy Blunt of Missouri, but it appeared unlikely that either of them would back her.
That leaves two other Republicans, Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitt Romney of Utah, as the most promising prospects for crossover support of Judge Jackson. Mr. Romney met with the judge on Tuesday but said he had not made up his mind and probably would not reveal his decision until the vote, now expected next week. He said the announcement by Ms. Collins would not figure into his thinking.
“I make the decision based on my own analysis and evaluation,” he said.
Ms. Murkowski, who is running for re-election this year in a contest projected to be the most expensive and challenging of her career, also may not make her decision known until next week. While she has supported more Biden administration lower-court judicial nominees than many of her colleagues — including Judge Jackson for her current spot on the appeals court — she voted against both justices former President Barack Obama named to the Supreme Court.
Ms. Collins has been willing to support Supreme Court nominees chosen by Democrats in the past, saying that presidents should have latitude in selecting a prospective justice. She opposed the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett after her nomination by President Donald J. Trump in 2020, objecting to the vote being held just days before the presidential election.
The Maine Republican was also one of only three in her party to vote in June for Judge Jackson’s confirmation for her current seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
1. Her confirmation is nearly ensured. After a bruising set of hearings, Democrats are united behind Judge Jackson. The backing of Senator Joe Manchin III signaled that all 50 Senate Democrats would support her nomination, which Republicans would be unable to stop.
2. Republicans show deep — but not total — opposition. G.O.P. senators attacked Judge Jackson for her record and grilled her on a host of divisive issues during the contentious hearings. Senator Susan Collins said she would support the judge’s nomination. It is unclear if other Republicans will join her.
3. The upcoming vote. With the confirmation hearings complete, the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Judge Jackson’s nomination on April 4. Democrats plan to move it quickly to the Senate floor for a final vote before the start of a two-week recess.
Ms. Collins, who sat down with Judge Jackson for about 90 minutes before last week’s hearings, had a second, hourlong in-person meeting with the judge on Tuesday afternoon in which the two hashed out several issues that came up before the Judiciary Committee.
During the hearings, Republicans on the panel raised questions about Judge Jackson’s sentencing history on child sex abuse defendants, and tried unsuccessfully to get her to express an opinion about whether seats should be added to the Supreme Court, as some progressives have advocated. Top Republicans, including some who were regarded as potential votes for Judge Jackson, have seized on her refusal to provide an answer on expanding the court as an obstacle to her confirmation
“I don’t understand that, because it’s not an issue that will come before her in the court, so she should as a nominee be able to talk about it,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “And I’m concerned that she’s not been willing to do that.”
But Ms. Collins said Judge Jackson had assured her in their conversation on Tuesday that she “would forever stay out of that issue.”
Republicans also seized last week on a legal brief that Judge Jackson filed on behalf of terrorism detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, which accused former President George W. Bush of having committed war crimes when his administration tortured detainees. Ms. Collins said Judge Jackson had explained during their meeting on Tuesday that she had not intended to accuse Mr. Bush personally of being a war criminal, but had used a common template for such cases.
“There can be no question that she is qualified to be a Supreme Court justice,” said Ms. Collins, citing Judge Jackson’s “breadth of experience as a law clerk, attorney in private practice, federal public defender, member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission and district court judge for more than eight years.”
The White House and Senate Democratic leaders have said that confirming Judge Jackson without Republican support would have been unfortunate considering it is taking what Democrats see as an overdue step to diversify of the court.
“I sincerely hope that we have Republican support for her nomination,” Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, said on Tuesday, noting that he had been “quietly” reaching out to Republican senators. “There are those within the Republican Party, I know from speaking to them, who understand the history, the significance of this nomination and want to make sure that Mr. Lincoln’s party, the Grand Old Party, is on board.”
Katie Rogers and Emily Cochrane contributed reporting.


What's your reaction?

In Love
Not Sure

You may also like

More in:Diaspora

Comments are closed.